Sept. 29—Members of the Frederick County Board of Schooling on Wednesday mentioned their imaginative and prescient for the system’s coverage on racism.
The present draft coverage is 4 pages lengthy and descriptions how Frederick County Public Faculties ought to deal with racial bias on a person and systemic stage. It calls on board members to “have interaction in common, candid and action-oriented discussions of race and racial inequities in FCPS”; and covers points from hiring and coaching to knowledge assortment to curriculum.
The proposed title of the coverage has switched forwards and backwards between “Anti-Racism” and “Addressing and Eliminating Racism.”
It was initially written together with volunteer members of the board’s Racial Fairness Committee. It has been edited and mentioned a number of instances by the board’s Coverage Committee in latest months.
Wednesday, although, was the primary time the whole board reviewed the coverage. Members gave suggestions and made solutions earlier than sending the doc again to the Coverage Committee for additional enhancing.
Board members emphasised that the eventual implementation of the coverage needs to be accompanied by common knowledge assortment and evaluation.
“We simply don’t need it to be a feel-good doc,” stated board president Brad Younger. “We now have to have the ability to measure what influence it is having.”
Officers additionally stated it could be important to collect college students and workers’ ideas all through the method.
A number of members and FCPS Superintendent Cheryl Dyson spoke in regards to the significance of making an environment friendly and standardized system for reporting acts of racism throughout the district and for responding to these reviews.
“That is how we construct belief,” Dyson stated, “and that is how we maintain it.”
The draft coverage features a definition of “racism in FCPS.” Member David Bass stated it needs to be up to date to incorporate a definition of systemic or institutional racism, too.
“One potential benefit of defining institutional racism could be to separate unhealthy acts by folks versus ongoing issues inside the faculty system akin to disproportionate suspensions, or not having sufficient college students of colour in honors lessons,” Bass stated. “There is a distinction between particular person acts of racism and ongoing disproportionate outcomes.”
That concept was additionally a part of the suggestions from the native NAACP chapter’s schooling committee, which submitted feedback on the coverage earlier this week.
“To not embody definitions of systemic and institutional racism is to disregard its existence, and level the finger at a couple of malevolent people,” the feedback learn.
NAACP Chapter President Willie Mahone echoed that sentiment Wednesday.
“They stored speaking about what to do about particular person incidents. However we all know what to do about these,” Mahone stated in an interview stated after the board’s Wednesday work session. “The institutional issues are the issues that we actually want to have a look at.”
Board member Jason Johnson stated the board ought to decide to reviewing the coverage yearly, which is extra frequent than is typical.
“I extremely doubt we will get it proper the primary time,” Johnson stated. “It is a very large and vital subject.”
Mahone agreed with Johnson, saying the varsity board should not rush the coverage by means of.
Bass had stated the board’s objective was to carry a remaining vote on the coverage in November or December.
“We should always take our time and do it appropriately,” Mahone stated.
Observe Jillian Atelsek on Twitter: @jillian_atelsek